<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Real Estate For Fun And Profit &#187; bank rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/tag/bank-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realestateforfunandprofit.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 04:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What should a company maximising EVA use discount rate for evaluating buy vs lease option. Is it WACC or bank?</title>
		<link>http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/what-should-a-company-maximising-eva-use-discount-rate-for-evaluating-buy-vs-lease-option-is-it-wacc-or-bank/</link>
		<comments>http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/what-should-a-company-maximising-eva-use-discount-rate-for-evaluating-buy-vs-lease-option-is-it-wacc-or-bank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cashflows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease option]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally a company evaluating buy vs lease option will use its borrowing rate from the bank to discount the cashflows. However if a company&#8217;s goal is to maximise its EVA, then for evaluation of lease vs buy decision, the WACC rate should be taken as the discount rate instead of the bank rate. Otherwise company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally a company evaluating buy vs lease option will use its borrowing rate from the bank to discount the cashflows. However if a company&#8217;s goal is to maximise its EVA, then for evaluation of lease vs buy decision, the WACC rate should be taken as the discount rate instead of the bank rate. Otherwise company may take a decision which may lowever its EVA.<br />
Please help me to solve this.
</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-6536779936621044";
/* 234x60, created 3/26/10 */
google_ad_slot = "8751897423";
google_ad_width = 234;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><!-- pingbacker_start --><br />
<h4>Similar Stories</h4>
<ul class='pc_pingback'>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href='http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/go/Credigy_Corp_Prepare_a_statement_of_cash_flows_for_the_Crosby_/478/1'>Credigy Corp | Prepare a statement of <b>cash flows</b> for the Crosby <b>&#8230;</b></a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href='http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/go/Lease_Option_Homes_Phoenix_NEWLY_REMODELED_YourAdsNow/478/2'><b>Lease Option</b> Homes Phoenix NEWLY REMODELED | YourAdsNow</a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href='http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/go/Arizona_Lease_Option_Homes_Phoenix_Rent_to_Own_Homes_in_Arizona_/478/3'>Arizona <b>Lease Option</b> Homes Phoenix Rent to Own Homes in Arizona <b>&#8230;</b></a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- pingbacker_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/what-should-a-company-maximising-eva-use-discount-rate-for-evaluating-buy-vs-lease-option-is-it-wacc-or-bank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

