<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Real Estate For Fun And Profit &#187; institutional lenders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/tag/institutional-lenders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realestateforfunandprofit.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why is seller financing exempt from usury laws?</title>
		<link>http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/why-is-seller-financing-exempt-from-usury-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/why-is-seller-financing-exempt-from-usury-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 12:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t understand why sellers-of-real-estate offering financing to buyers should be exempt from usury regulations. (I know this is true in NY state). It benefits the sellers, but why would this be in the states&#8217; best interest? Is it perhaps because it facilitates the primary mortgage market without involving institutional lenders? Still, it seems downright [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why sellers-of-real-estate offering financing to buyers should be exempt from usury regulations. (I know this is true in NY state). It benefits the sellers, but why would this be in the states&#8217; best interest? Is it perhaps because it facilitates the primary mortgage market without involving institutional lenders? Still, it seems downright shady to me.
</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-6536779936621044";
/* 234x60, created 3/26/10 */
google_ad_slot = "8751897423";
google_ad_width = 234;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script><!-- pingbacker_start --><br />
<h4>Similar Stories</h4>
<ul class='pc_pingback'>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href='http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/go/The_Best_Bank_CD_Interest_Rates_May_24_2010_SelectCDRates_com_/298/1'>The <b>Best</b> Bank CD <b>Interest</b> Rates May 24, 2010 | SelectCDRates.com <b>&#8230;</b></a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href='http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/go/Refinancing_Home_Loan_What_Is_The_Best_Way_To_Consolidate_High_/298/2'>Refinancing Home Loan – What Is The <b>Best</b> Way To Consolidate High <b>&#8230;</b></a></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href='http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/go/Institutional_Lenders_And_Political_Blood_Letting_And_The_Goblins_/298/3'><b>Institutional Lenders</b> And Political Blood Letting And The Goblins <b>&#8230;</b></a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- pingbacker_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://realestateforfunandprofit.com/why-is-seller-financing-exempt-from-usury-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

